YOu can leave the retrospective implementation to me.
Start using it, and tell me if you meet any problems.
Thanks
David IB
At 11:53 13/10/2009, galen goldsmith wrote:
>David,
>
>I see what you mean--that will solve the problem of where a
>poss/prob includes the entire clause, but the clause has shades of
>meaning that should also be annotated. I think there are a few in
>Ps. 1-29 I'll be able to clarify.
>
>I will study the examples and work out how to implement the change this week.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Galen
No comments:
Post a Comment